Loading...
Loading...
Chapter 5 of 52 min read
الإرث وإصلاح التعليم الفقهي الإسلامي
Al-Fikr as-Sami is not only a historical work but also an implicit argument for the reform of Islamic legal education and practice. Al-Hajwi wrote in an era when the traditional Islamic legal institutions of Morocco faced serious challenges from French colonial administration, and his historical analysis of the fiqh tradition was shaped by his understanding of what the tradition needed to do in order to survive and serve its community.
By showing that Islamic law had always developed — that the four schools had evolved over centuries in response to changing circumstances — al-Hajwi argued implicitly that ijtihad was not only historically possible but historically normal. The ossification of fiqh into rigid taqlid (uncritical adherence to existing opinions) was not, he argued, the natural state of the tradition but a historical deviation that had developed under specific circumstances and could be overcome.
His advocacy for the engagement of Islamic scholarship with modern conditions — while remaining firmly within the framework of Islamic legal methodology — reflected his position as a modernizing traditionalist: someone who believed that the Islamic legal tradition had the resources to address contemporary challenges without abandoning its foundations.
Al-Fikr as-Sami influenced subsequent scholars of Islamic legal history in the Maghreb and beyond. His combination of historical scholarship and reformist purpose anticipated the concerns of later twentieth-century scholars who sought to understand the history of Islamic law as a resource for its contemporary renewal.
For contemporary students of Islamic legal history, Al-Fikr as-Sami provides a comprehensive overview of the major developments in fiqh from a sympathetic insider perspective — an author who knew the Maliki tradition from the inside and could write about all four schools with the understanding of someone who had spent a lifetime in the tradition. This combination of scholarly depth and committed engagement gives the work a character that purely academic histories of Islamic law do not replicate.