Loading...
Loading...
Chapter 4 of 43 min read
رؤية الله في الآخرة
Among the eschatological doctrines that Al-Radd ala al-Jahmiyyah defends, the beatific vision, the seeing of Allah by the believers in Paradise, occupies a position of special importance. Ahmad ibn Hanbal marshals a substantial body of hadith evidence to establish that the believers will literally see Allah on the Day of Resurrection and in Paradise. The most famous of these hadiths compares seeing Allah to seeing the full moon on a cloudless night: just as the moon is seen clearly without difficulty, the believers will see Allah clearly on that day. Ahmad regards this hadith, transmitted through multiple chains, as among the most reliably established reports in the entire prophetic tradition.
The Mu'tazilites and the Jahmites denied the beatific vision on philosophical grounds. Their argument was that seeing requires a direction, a location, and some kind of spatial relationship between the seer and the seen. Since Allah transcends all spatial location and direction, He cannot be seen in any literal sense. Ahmad's response was characteristic: the philosophical argument assumes that divine vision must work like human vision, constrained by the same spatial and perceptual conditions. But Allah is not subject to the conditions of created things. He can make Himself visible to His servants in a manner that transcends the categories of creaturely sight without that visibility implying any spatial limitation or anthropomorphic quality.
Ahmad also addresses the Quranic evidence on both sides of this question. The Mu'tazilites cited the verse 'Vision cannot encompass Him' (6:103) as evidence that seeing Allah is impossible. Ahmad interpreted this verse as referring to the comprehensive comprehension of the divine essence, not to all possibility of visual perception. The verse denies that created sight can fully grasp or contain Allah, not that it can see Him at all. This interpretive distinction allowed Ahmad to affirm both Quranic statements: Allah cannot be fully encompassed by created sight, but He can and will be seen by the believers in a real but not comprehensive manner.
The broader eschatological framework of Al-Radd affirms all the major realities of the afterlife: resurrection, judgment, the balance of deeds, Paradise, and Hellfire. Ahmad insists that these are literal realities, not allegories or spiritual states. The happiness of Paradise and the suffering of Hellfire are real. The description of Paradise in the Quran as a garden with rivers, fruits, and the company of righteous companions is not mere metaphor for some ineffable spiritual state. The Jahmites tended toward allegorization of these descriptions, and Ahmad's refutation extends to this tendency as well. The final message of Al-Radd is that the Muslim must trust the testimony of Allah and His Prophet about the unseen world, affirming what has been revealed without subjecting it to the conditions of philosophical plausibility.