Loading...
Loading...
Chapter 5 of 53 min read
الإسلام والعلم الحديث: نحو إطار جديد
The relationship between Islam and modern science is one of the most pressing intellectual challenges facing Muslim thinkers today. Muzaffar Iqbal examines this relationship in its full complexity, addressing the apparent tensions between certain scientific claims and Islamic theology, the question of the 'Islamization of knowledge,' and the prospects for developing a distinctively Islamic philosophy of science adequate to contemporary challenges.
Modern science presents Muslims with a range of intellectual challenges of varying degrees of seriousness. At the most fundamental level, the theory of evolution poses questions about the Quranic account of human origins. Iqbal notes that Muslim scholars have held a range of positions on this question: some accept evolutionary biology in its entirety as consistent with a theistic reading of natural history; others accept common descent with modification for non-human life while insisting on a special creation of humanity; and others reject evolutionary theory on both scientific and theological grounds. What Iqbal emphasizes is that these are legitimate positions for Muslim thinkers to hold and debate, and that the question requires careful engagement with both the scientific evidence and the Islamic textual tradition.
The philosophy of science itself — the question of what scientific method can and cannot tell us about reality — is crucial for Muslims engaging with modern science. Modern science in its dominant form operates within a methodological naturalism that brackets questions of divine causation for the purposes of scientific explanation. Iqbal argues that Muslims should understand and appreciate this methodological constraint without confusing it with the metaphysical naturalism that claims there is no reality beyond what science can measure. The former is a tool; the latter is a philosophy that overreaches the tool's proper scope.
The Islamization of Knowledge project — most associated with the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) founded in the 1980s — represents one major Muslim intellectual response to the challenge of modern science and social science. This project sought to critically examine the epistemological assumptions embedded in modern academic disciplines and to reconstruct them on Islamic foundations. Iqbal examines this project with sympathy for its goals and critical attention to its achievements and limitations.
Iqbal advocates for a renewed Islamic philosophy of nature that begins from the Quranic worldview — the cosmos as a created reality governed by divine laws, saturated with signs of its Creator, and fundamentally coherent — and engages modern science on this foundation. Such a philosophy would neither defensively dismiss modern science nor uncritically accept its philosophical claims, but would bring the resources of the Islamic intellectual tradition — including its sophisticated epistemology, its understanding of the relationship between reason and revelation, and its cosmic perspective — into genuine dialogue with the best of contemporary scientific thought.
The practical dimensions of this vision include: rebuilding scientific institutions in Muslim-majority countries that are both technically excellent and intellectually grounded in Islamic values; training Muslim scientists who are also well-formed in the Islamic intellectual tradition; developing Islamic bioethics, environmental ethics, and technology ethics grounded in Islamic principles; and maintaining a critical but engaged relationship with the global scientific community. Iqbal's vision is of a Muslim scientific community that is a full participant in human scientific endeavor — contributing to it, learning from it, and enriching it with perspectives that the dominant secular framework cannot provide.