Loading...
Loading...
Chapter 3 of 52 min read
الكلام الماتريدي في تفسير القرآن
Madarik at-Tanzil's most distinctive contribution to the tafsir tradition is its systematic application of Maturidi theological positions to Quranic interpretation. For scholars of Islamic theology, the work is invaluable for tracing how Maturidi doctrines — which differ from Ash'ari positions on several important points — found expression in Quranic commentary.
Abu Mansur al-Maturidi of Samarkand (d. 333 AH) founded the theological school that bears his name as a Sunni alternative to both the Mu'tazilites and the Ash'arites on the one hand and the strict ahl al-hadith literalists on the other. Like the Ash'arites, the Maturidis engaged in rational theology (kalam) to defend Sunni doctrines. Their specific positions on divine attributes, human agency, faith (iman), and divine wisdom (hikma) have points of overlap with Ash'ari positions but also significant distinctions.
On divine attributes, the Maturidi position as reflected in an-Nasafi's commentary is close to the Ash'ari approach: affirm the attributes transmitted in the Quran and Sunnah, interpret apparent anthropomorphisms in ways consistent with divine transcendence, and reject the Mu'tazili tendency to deny attributes altogether. The Maturidi distinction is that their affirmation of attributes is somewhat more robust in some areas — for instance, on the divine attribute of divine speech (kalam) as subsisting in the divine essence.
On human agency, Maturidi doctrine holds that humans possess a real capacity (istita'a) before the act — a position that gives somewhat more genuine agency to human choice than the Ash'ari account. An-Nasafi's commentary on the guidance and misguidance verses reflects this: divine misguidance follows upon human choice to disbelieve, rather than preceding and determining that choice, a nuance with significant implications for the theodicy of divine justice.
On faith (iman), the Maturidi school holds that acknowledgment by the heart (tasdiq) constitutes faith without requiring verbal declaration (iqrar) as an additional condition for the definition of a believer — a difference from the Ash'ari position with practical implications for how certain Quranic verses about believers are interpreted in an-Nasafi's commentary.