Loading...
Loading...
Editorial Introduction3 min read
مقدمة
Umm al-Barahin, formally known as Al-'aqeedah al-Sanusiyyah or Al-Sanusiyyah al-Sughra, is one of the most widely memorized and taught creedal texts in the history of Sunni Islam. Its author, Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Sanusi (837–895 AH / 1433–1490 CE), was a Maliki jurist and Ash'ari theologian from Tlemcen in present-day Algeria. Al-Sanusi was a prolific writer on Islamic theology ('ilm al-kalam) and logic, composing several creedal works at varying levels of depth, of which Umm al-Barahin is the most celebrated for its concision and pedagogical clarity. He studied with the leading scholars of the Maghrib and Andalusia, and his works became the backbone of traditional theological education across West Africa, North Africa, and the Malay Archipelago.
The text is compact — in its bare form, it runs to only a few pages — yet it systematically covers the foundational doctrines that every Muslim is obligated to know. Al-Sanusi organizes the work around twenty attributes that are necessarily true of Allah (such as existence, oneness, power, will, knowledge, and life), the six attributes that are impossible for Allah (such as non-existence and powerlessness), and the one attribute that is possible (namely, the creation or non-creation of any contingent thing). The same tripartite framework is then applied to the Prophets and Messengers, covering their necessary, impossible, and possible attributes. This logical scaffolding, drawn from the Ash'ari and Maturidi kalam tradition, was designed to make correct belief both teachable and verifiable.
What distinguishes Umm al-Barahin from earlier creedal texts — such as the Tahawiyyah or the Wasitiyyah — is its explicitly scholastic methodology. Al-Sanusi employs rational demonstration (burhan) alongside scriptural evidence, arguing that rational proofs and revealed texts together establish the attributes of Allah. This approach reflects the mature Ash'ari tradition's integration of Aristotelian logic into theological discourse, a methodology accepted within Ahl us-Sunnah alongside the more text-focused Athari approach. Readers coming from a strictly Athari background should understand that the theological method here differs from that of Ibn Taymiyyah and his school, though the creedal conclusions on the core attributes of Allah are shared.
The text's immense pedagogical reach is reflected in the number of commentaries it generated. Among the most important are al-Sanusi's own commentary (Sharh Umm al-Barahin), the commentary of Muhammad al-Dasuki, and the supercommentary of Ibrahim al-Bajuri — the last of which became standard in Al-Azhar and many traditional West African institutions. In Senegal, Mali, Mauritania, Nigeria, and across the Malay world, students have committed Umm al-Barahin to memory as a basic prerequisite for advanced study, much as students of fiqh memorize Matn al-Ghayah or Matn Abi Shuja'.
For contemporary readers, Umm al-Barahin offers a precise vocabulary for discussing the divine attributes — a vocabulary that guards against both anthropomorphism (tashbih) and unwarranted negation (ta'til). While the kalam methodology it employs has been debated within the Sunni tradition, its creedal conclusions represent the broad consensus of Ahl us-Sunnah on tawhid al-sifat. Students are well advised to read it alongside a qualified commentary and with awareness of the broader tradition of Sunni creedal literature, so that its technical terms are understood in their proper scholarly context rather than in isolation.