Loading...
Loading...
Chapter 3 of 53 min read
شرح أصول اعتقاد أهل السنة — الإيمان بالقرآن والسنة
The theological positions documented in Sharh Usul I'tiqad reflect what al-Lalika'i understood as the consensus of the early Muslim community on the fundamental questions of Islamic theology. Examining these positions clarifies both the content of the Athari creedal tradition and the specific disputes that the work was addressing.
On the divine attributes, the documented position is consistent and clear: God is described by the attributes He has ascribed to Himself in the Quran and those attributed to Him by the Prophet in authentic hadith. These attributes are real, not metaphorical, and are not to be reinterpreted away. At the same time, God is unlike created things — His hearing is unlike created hearing, His knowledge unlike created knowledge. The early community did not speculate about the modality (kayfiyyah) of the divine attributes; they affirmed the attributes and denied any resemblance to creation, refraining from asking how. This position — often described as ithbat bila tashbih, affirmation without likening — is the consistent thread running through the hundreds of narrations al-Lalika'i assembles.
On faith, the documented position is that faith consists of belief in the heart, verbal affirmation, and action of the limbs. This tripartite definition distinguishes the Sunni position from the Murji'a, who held that actions were not part of faith and therefore sin did not harm faith, and from the Khawarij, who held that major sins invalidated faith entirely. The recorded statements of early scholars consistently affirm that faith increases with obedience and decreases with disobedience, though a Muslim who commits major sins does not necessarily exit Islam entirely.
On the Quran, the position documented is that the Quran is the uncreated speech of God. This was the point of the mihna controversy: the Mu'tazila held that the Quran, as a created thing, was created, and the Abbasid caliphs imposed this view on scholars for a period. Ahmad ibn Hanbal's refusal to accept the doctrine, even under torture and imprisonment, made him the defining symbol of the traditionalist position. Al-Lalika'i documents the statements of dozens of early scholars affirming that the Quran is the speech of God, not created.
On predestination, the documented position affirms that everything — including human actions — occurs by divine decree, while maintaining that humans have genuine agency and that God does not compel sin. The Qadariyyah, who denied divine predetermination of human actions, are consistently criticized in the recorded statements as having departed from the transmitted position.
The comprehensive documentation of these positions across generations of scholarship gave the work its authority. A reader could see not merely an individual scholar's opinion but a tradition stretching from the companions of the Prophet through the leading scholars of two centuries of subsequent Islamic history.