Loading...
Loading...
Editorial Introduction3 min read
مقدمة
Al-ʿĀlim wa-l-Mutaʿallim, which may be translated as The Scholar and the Student, is a treatise in dialogue form addressing fundamental questions of Islamic theology. The text is associated with Imam Abū Ḥanīfa al-Nuʿmān ibn Thābit (80-150 AH / 699-767 CE), with some classical sources attributing authorship to him directly and others identifying it as a record of his theological exchanges compiled by his student Abū Muqātil Ḥafṣ ibn Sālim al-Samarqandī (d. 208 AH). The dialogue format, in which a student poses theological questions and a teacher provides systematic answers, was a recognized literary and pedagogical form in early Islamic scholarship, allowing difficult doctrinal positions to be explained accessibly while also recording the intellectual method of the master. Whatever the precise relationship between Abū Ḥanīfa and the final form of the text, its contents align closely with the positions Abū Ḥanīfa defended in his other creedal works, particularly al-Fiqh al-Akbar and the theological letters attributed to him.
The questions treated in al-ʿĀlim wa-l-Mutaʿallim span the core disputes of early Islamic theology. The text engages with the definition and nature of faith (īmān), asking whether faith increases and decreases, how it relates to deeds, and what distinguishes the believer from the unbeliever and the hypocrite. It addresses the divine attributes and the impermissibility of attributing to Allāh what He has not attributed to Himself or denying what He has affirmed. Questions of human agency, divine will, and predestination (qadar) receive attention, as do matters related to prophethood, the eschatological realities described in revelation, and the proper attitude toward the Companions of the Prophet. Throughout, Abū Ḥanīfa's responses affirm the positions of the Ahl al-Sunnah wa-l-Jamāʿah against the errors of the Muʿtazilah, Jahmiyyah, Qadariyyah, Khawārij, and Murjiʾah, the major deviant theological tendencies of his era.
The significance of al-ʿĀlim wa-l-Mutaʿallim for Islamic intellectual history lies in its early date, its accessibility, and its demonstration that Abū Ḥanīfa engaged seriously and systematically with kalām (theological disputation) even as he insisted on the primacy of the Quran and Sunnah over speculative reasoning. The text offers a window into the lived theological controversies of the second Islamic century, a period in which the boundaries of orthodox Sunnī belief were being actively defined in response to genuine intellectual challenges. Scholars of Islamic theology value it as a complement to al-Fiqh al-Akbar, providing a more discursive and argumentative texture to positions that the latter presents in bare declarative form. Its dialogue structure also makes it a useful example of the pedagogical methods of early Islamic scholarship.
Readers coming to al-ʿĀlim wa-l-Mutaʿallim are advised to approach it in light of the theological landscape of the early Abbasid period, when the questions it addresses were not academic exercises but live controversies with implications for the unity and integrity of the Muslim community. Some familiarity with the basic positions of the Muʿtazilah and the Murjiʾah will help contextualize Abū Ḥanīfa's refutations. The text is relatively concise and benefits from comparative reading alongside al-Fiqh al-Akbar and the classical commentaries on both works. Scholars of the Ḥanafī school, students of early Islamic theology, and anyone seeking to understand the roots of Māturīdī kalām will find al-ʿĀlim wa-l-Mutaʿallim an indispensable primary source.