Loading...
Loading...
ุนู ุฑู ุจู ุดุนูุจ ุจู ู ุญู ุฏ ุงูุณูู ู
Amr ibn Shuayb ibn Muhammad was a Hijazi scholar of the tabi'un generation whose significance in Islamic hadith literature rests primarily on his role as the transmitter of a substantial corpus of hadith attributed to his grandfather, the companion Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-As. His full genealogy โ Amr ibn Shuayb ibn Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Amr ibn al-As โ places him as a great-grandson of the prominent companion Abdullah ibn Amr, one of the most prolific recorders of prophetic traditions.
The chain known in hadith terminology as Amr ibn Shuayb an abihi an jaddihi (Amr ibn Shuayb from his father from his grandfather) became one of the most discussed and debated chains in the science of hadith. Some scholars, including a minority among the major critics, expressed reservations about certain links in this chain, while the majority of hadith scholars accepted it as sound for establishing legal rulings (hujja), though perhaps not of the highest grade of rigorously authenticated (sahih) chains.
Amr transmitted not only through this chain from his grandfather but also from a wider range of scholars. His father Shuayb ibn Muhammad was himself a transmitter of some note, and Amr learned from him directly. He also narrated from other companions' descendants and tabi'un scholars active in the Hijaz during his lifetime.
His narrations cover a wide range of Islamic legal topics, including inheritance, commercial transactions, criminal penalties (hudud), family law, and ritual matters. The breadth of legal content attributed to this chain made it particularly valuable for jurists even when hadith critics debated its exact grading.
Among the major scholars who transmitted from Amr ibn Shuayb were Husayn al-Muallim, Ibn Jurayj, al-Hajjaj ibn Artah, and others active in the Hijaz and adjacent regions during the early to mid-second Islamic century. The fact that major scholars of their caliber relied on him confirms the practical importance of his narrations.
The debate over his chain should be understood in its proper scholarly context: it does not imply that Amr ibn Shuayb was dishonest or incompetent, but rather reflects the precise technical standards that hadith critics applied to every link in every chain. Al-Dhahabi's treatment of him in Mizan al-I'tidal is measured and balanced, noting both the concerns and the broad acceptance of his narrations among fuqaha.
Amr ibn Shuayb died around 118 AH, having preserved a significant portion of the hadith tradition through a uniquely valuable genealogical chain that would continue to be studied, debated, and applied by Islamic scholars for centuries afterward.
No linked books yet.